Form 0-135-150
USD#
261
5/2012
USD Form 150
2012-2013
ESTIMATED LEGAL MAXIMUM GENERAL FUND BUDGET
General Fund Budget – Lines 1 through 21
1. Estimated 9-20-2012 FTE enrollment (from Table I or Table IV) (Exclude 4 yr old at-risk FTE.)
=
4,910.0
2. Estimated 9-20-2012 4yr old at risk FTE enrollment (e) (Must be approved.)(At-risk students count as .5 FTE)
75.0 +
0.0
(Table IV, Line 4)
=
75.0
3. Total Estimated 9-20-2012 FTE Enrollment (Line 1 + Line 2)
=
4,985.0
4. Estimated low enrollment and high enrollment for districts. 9-20-2012 FTE enrollment
(from line 3)
4,985.0 x
0.035040
factor (from Table II or pages 5, 6)
=
174.7
5. Estimated weighted bilingual education enrollment. 9-20-2012 bilingual
=
23.0
FTE (a)
58.3333 +
0.0000
(Table IV, Line 5) x 0.395
6. Estimated weighted vocational education enrollment. 9-20-2012 vocational education
FTE(b)
125.0000 +
0.0000
(Table IV, Line 6) x 0.5
=
62.5
7. Estimated weighted at-risk student enrollment(c). Number of eligible students that qualify for free lunches
as of 9-20-2012
2,269 +
0
(Table IV, Line 7) x 0.456
=
1,034.7
8. Estimated High At-Risk Weighting.
District's calculated free lunch percentage for current year:
(Comes from Table VI, Line 1)
45.52%
District's calculated students per square mile:
Line 3 / square miles in district = 4985 / 36 =
138.5
a. Number of students eligible for free lunch (at least 50%)
(2269+0) x
0.105 =
0.0
b. Number of students eligible for free lunches at 35.1% and 212.1 students per square mile.
(2269+0) x
0.105 =
0.0
c. Number of students eligible for free lunches (35-49.99%)
(2269+0) x (0.4552-0.3500) x 0.7
=
167.1
9. Est. Non-Proficient student weighting. Number of non-proficient students. (g) (
241 x
0.0465 )
=
11.2
10. Estimated weighted FTE for new facilities. 9-20-2012 enrollment of students attending a
new facility (d)
0.0 +
0.0
(Table IV, Line 9) x 0.25
=
0.0
11. Estimated weighted FTE for transportation. (Table III, Line 5)
=
307.0
12. Estimated weighted FTE virtual enrollment. (Table V, Line 4)
=
0.0
13. Estimated ancillary facilities weighting. Amt approved by Court of Tax Appeals
0 ÷
$3,838
=
0.0
14. Estimated Special Education weighting. Amount of Sp. Ed. Funding (f)
4,653,100 ÷
$3,838
=
1,212.4
15. Estimated Declining Enrollment weighting. Amt apprvd by Court of Tax Appeals
0 ÷
$3,838
=
0.0
16. Estimated FHSU Math & Science Academy FTE enrollment
=
0.0
17. Estimated 2012-2013 operating budget. (Lines 3 through 16)
7,977.6 x
$3,838
=
$30,618,029
18. Estimated Cost of Living weighting
$0
÷
$3,838
=
0.0
(maximum allowed for this district)
(Amt district will use, up to the maximum)
19. Estimated 2012-2013 operating budget. (Include Cost of Living and FHSU)
7,977.6 x
$3,838
=
$30,618,029
20. Amount to transfer to General Fund (Form 149, Line 3).
=
$0
21. Total General Fund Budget Authority (Form 150 Line 19 + Line 20)
=
$30,618,029
Local Option Budget -- See Form 155
22. Estimated 2012-2013 LOB General Fund budget (excludes FHSU weighting & includes higher of 2008-09 Spec Ed or current year Spec Ed)
(Lines 3 through 13 + 15 + 18) = 6765.2 x $4,433 = $29990132 +
4,653,100 (Spec Ed)
=
$34,643,232
8/15/2012
10:35 AM
Form 150
Page 1
(a) FTE is computed by taking the total clock hours of bilingual students who are enrolled and attending in an
approved bilingual class on 9-20-2012 and dividing by 6 (cannot exceed 6 hours for an individual student). Total
clock hours
350.0 ÷ 6 =
58.3333 (Record on Line 5)
(b) FTE is computed by taking the total clock hours of vocational education students who are enrolled and attending
in an approved vocational class on 9-20-2012 and dividing by 6 (cannot exceed 6 hours for an individual student). Total
clock hours
750.0 ÷ 6 =
125.0000 (Record on Line 6)
(c) USD must have an approved at-risk pupil assistance plan for the school district.
(d) In order to access new facilities weighting, a USD must have adopted at least a 25% LOB.
(e) Four year old at risk students are counted as .5 FTE. USD must be approved by the Kansas State Department
of Education.
(f) Comes from form 118 (line 20).
(g) 2011-2012 Non Proficient students (excluding free students).
(NOTE: If September 20 falls on a weekend, the following Monday will be the official count date.)
USD#
261
1. September 20, 2011, FTE and February 20, 2012 FTE enrollment (Excludes 4 yr old at risk students.)
=
4,886.6
2. September 20, 2012, FTE enrollment (Excludes 4 yr old at risk students.)
=
4,910.0
3. 3 YR AVG FTE: (
4,873.6
+
4,886.6
+
(9/20/2010 FTE)*
(line 1)
4,910.0
)/3=
4,890.1
=
4,890.1
(line 2)
(goes to line 3)
* Excludes 4 yr old at risk students, but includes 2/20/2011 military students.
4. FTE enrollment for budget purposes (higher of line 1, 2, or 3)(Goes to page 1, line 1 if no military provision; see Table IV.)
=
4,910.0
TABLE II
Low and High Enrollment Weighting
Enrollment of District
Factor
0 - 99.9
1.014331
100 - 299.9
{[7337 - 9.655 (E - 100)]÷3642.4} -1
300 - 1,621.9
{[5406 - 1.237500 (E - 300)]÷3642.4} -1
1622 and over
0.03504
'E' is 9-20-2012 Adjusted FTE Enrollment (from Page 1, line 3)
EXAMPLE: (FTE of 954.0)
FOR COMPUTED FACTORS
SEE 2012-2013 LOW ENROLLMENT
{[5406 - 1.237500 (954.0 - 300)]÷3642.4}-1
AND HIGH ENROLLMENT FACTOR
{[5406 - 1.237500 (654.0)]÷3642.4}-1
TABLE (PAGES 5 AND 6)
{[5406 - 809.325]÷3642.4}-1
{4597.675÷3642.4} -1
1.261991-1
0.261991
TABLE III
Transportation Weighting
1. Area of district in square miles 9-20-2012.
=
36.0
2. All public pupils transported or for whom transportation is being made available 9-20-2012
who reside in the district 2.5 miles or more (Estimated)
2,100.0 +
0.0 (Table IV) =
2,100.0
(Line 8)
3. Index of density = Line 2
2,100.0 divided by Line 1
36.0
=
58.33
4. Using index of density (Line 3), determine transportation weighting factor.
=
0.1462
5. Estimated weighted FTE for transportation. 9-20-2012 number of resident students over
2.5 miles (line 2)
2,100.0 x
0.1462 factor (Line 4) (to Line 11, Page 1)
=
307.0
USD#
261
TABLE I
Declining Enrollment Calculation
TABLE IV
8/15/2012
10:35 AM
Form 150
Page 2
House Bill 2059 - Military Provision
1. Estimated Adjusted 9-20-2012 FTE (Table 1, Line 4, Form 150)
=
4,910.0
2. Estimated 2-20-2013 FTE (excludes 4 yr old at risk students) of new students of military
families, not enrolled on 9-20-2012 (Must be at least 25 FTE or 1% of Line 1. If it doesn't
0.0
=
0.0
meet criteria then calculates zero.)
3. Estimated FTE Enrollment count for 2012-2013 (Line 1 + Line 2) to Line 1, Form 150
=
4,910.0
Number of students in Line 2 with the following weighting factors:
4. Estimated 2-20-2013 4yr old FTE (add to Line 2, Form 150)
=
0.0
5. Estimated weighted bilingual education enrollment. 2-20-2013 bilingual FTE (a)
0.0000 x 0.395 =
0.0
(add to Line 5, Form 150)
6. Estimated weighted vocational education enrollment. 2-20-2013 vocational education
FTE (b)
0.0000 x
0.5 (add to Line 6, Form 150)
=
0.0
7. Estimated weighted at-risk student enrollment ( c). Number of students eligible that qualify for
free lunches as of 2-20-2013
0 x 0.456 (add to Line 7, Form 150)
=
0.0
8. Estimated 2-20-2013 FTE of new students of military families, not enrolled on 9-20-2012 transported or for whom
=
0.0
transportation is being made available 2-20-2013 who reside in the district 2.5 miles or more
(goes to Table III, Line 2, Form 150)
9. Estimated weighted 2-20-2013 FTE for New Facilities (d)
FTE
0.0 x 0.25
=
0.0
(add to Line 10, Form 150)
(a) FTE is computed by taking the total clock hours of bilingual students who are enrolled and attending in an
approved bilingual class on 2-20-2013 and dividing by 6 (cannot exceed 6 hours for an individual student). Total
clock hours
0.0 ÷ 6 =
0.0000 (Record on Line 5)
(b) FTE is computed by taking the total clock hours of vocational students who are enrolled and attending in an
approved vocational class on 2-20-2013 and dividing by 6 (cannot exceed 6 hours for an individual student). Total
clock hours
0.0 ÷ 6 =
0.0000 (Record on Line 6)
(c) USD must have an approved at-risk pupil assistance plan for the school district.
(d) In order to access new facilities weighting, a USD must have adopted at least a 25% LOB.
1. Estimated 9/20/2012 FTE Virtual Enrollment
0.0 X
1.05
=
0.0
2. Estimated Non-Proficient* Virtual Students (headcount)
0 X
0.25
=
0.0
3. Estimated Virtual Students Taking AP** Courses
1st Semester
0 X
.08 =
0.0
2nd Semester
0 X
.08 =
0.0
0.0
4. Estimated Weighted FTE Virtual Enrollment
0.0
* This provision applies to pupils that would qualify for paid or reduced priced lunches, and did not meet proficient
in Math or Reading State Assessments in the prior year. The virtual school must have a virtual at-risk pupil assistance plan on file with KSDE.
** The Advanced Placement (AP) course is not available in the home district of the virtual pupil. The home
district is either more than 200 square miles or has an enrollment of at least 260 pupils.
"Virtual School" means any school or educational program that: (1) Is offered for credit; (2) uses distance-learning
technologies which predominately use internet-based methods to deliver instruction; (3) involves instruction that
occurs asynchronously with the teacher and pupil in separate locations; (4) requires the pupil to make academic
progress toward the next grade level and matriculation from kindergarten through high school graduation;
(5) requires the pupil to demonstrate competence in subject matter for each class or subject in which the pupil
is enrolled as part of the virtual school; and (6) requires age-appropriate pupils to complete state assessment tests.
TABLE V
Virtual Enrollment Weighting (K.S.A. 72-3715, 72-3716)
8/15/2012
10:35 AM
Form 150
Page 3
1. Calculated free lunch percentage for the current year (goes to page 1, line 8)
(Page 1, Line 7 total students eligible for Free Lunches) / (Page 1, Line 3) = 2269 + 0 / 4985 =
45.52%
=
45.52%
2. District's calculated free lunch percentage for the prior year (info only)
=
43.90%
ADDITIONAL DEFINITION FOR SCHOOL FACILITIES (Must use a minimum LOB listed below to qualify for this provision.)
a) School Facilities Definition - School facilities weighting is available for school districts whose adopted local option budget (LOB)
is at least 25% for 2012-13 and have constructed an entirely new facility or an addition to an existing facility.
The determination of weighting will be based upon the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) students that are enrolled and
attending in the new facility September 20 (and February 20 for districts qualifying under K.S.A. 72-6448).
In the case of school districts that have constructed an addition to existing facilities, the number of students that are enrolled
and attending in the new addition will be counted on a full-time equivalent basis (see example 2.) The additional weighting
for this provision of the law is applicable for two years only. For a new facility, the FTE is for the entire building
(see example 1). For additions to an existing facility, the following calculating would be utilized.
Example #1: (For new buildings.)
For a totally new constructed building, the FTE equals the total enrollment FTE for that building.
Headcount
FTE
Kindergarten
77
38.5
Grade 1
87
87.0
Grade 2
81
81.0
Grade 3
75
75.0
Weighting for example:
281.5 X 0.25 = 70.4 X $3838 = $270195
Example #2: (For new additions)
Total number of students in each new classroom
Number of class periods (divide by)
Full-time equivalent enrollment =
Example:
New classroom A =
105 students for the day
New classroom B =
154 students for the day
New classroom C =
133 students for the day
New classroom D =
121 students for the day
TOTAL =
513
divide by
7 class periods
=
73.3 FTE
Weighting for above example: 73.3 X 0.25 = 18.3 X $3838 = $70235
Qualifying for New Facilities Weighting
In order to qualify for new facilities weighting, a district must have adopted at least a 25% local option budget.
TABLE VI
High At-Risk Weighting Calculation
8/15/2012
10:35 AM
Form 150
Page 4