2013-14 Haysville USD 261 Budget.pdf

Form 0-135-150

USD#

261

5/2013

USD Form 150

2013-2014

ESTIMATED LEGAL MAXIMUM GENERAL FUND BUDGET

General Fund Budget – Lines 1 through 21

1. Estimated 9-20-2013 FTE enrollment (from Table I or Table IV) (Exclude 4 yr old at-risk FTE.)

5,050.0

2. Estimated 9-20-2013 4yr old at risk FTE enrollment (e) (Must be approved.)(At-risk students count as .5 FTE)

75.0 +

0.0

(Table IV, Line 4)

75.0

3. Total Estimated 9-20-2013 FTE Enrollment (Line 1 + Line 2)

5,125.0

4. Estimated low enrollment and high enrollment for districts. 9-20-2013 FTE enrollment

(from line 3)

5,125.0

0.035040

factor (from Table II or pages 5, 6)

179.6

5. Estimated weighted bilingual education enrollment. 9-20-2013 bilingual

20.7

FTE (a)

52.5000 +

0.0000

(Table IV, Line 5) x 0.395

6. Estimated weighted vocational education enrollment. 9-20-2013 vocational education

FTE(b)

141.6667 +

0.0000

(Table IV, Line 6) x 0.5

70.8

7. Estimated weighted at-risk student enrollment(c). Number of eligible students that qualify for free lunches

as of 9-20-2013

2,500 +

(Table IV, Line 7) x 0.456

1,140.0

8. Estimated High At-Risk Weighting.

District's calculated free lunch percentage for current year:

(Comes from Table VI, Line 1)

48.80%

District's calculated students per square mile:

Line 3 / square miles in district = 5125 / 36 =

142.4

a. Number of students eligible for free lunch (at least 50%)

(2500+0) x

0.105 =

0.0

b. Number of students eligible for free lunches at 35.1% and 212.1 students per square mile.

(2500+0) x

0.105 =

0.0

c. Number of students eligible for free lunches (35-49.99%)

(2500+0) x (0.488-0.3500) x 0.7

241.5

9. Est. Non-Proficient student weighting. Number of non-proficient students. (g) (

198

0.0465 )

9.2

10. Estimated weighted FTE for new facilities. 9-20-2013 enrollment of students attending a

new facility (d)

0.0 +

0.0

(Table IV, Line 9) x 0.25

0.0

11. Estimated weighted FTE for transportation. (Table III, Line 5)

278.6

12. Estimated weighted FTE virtual enrollment. (Table V, Line 4)

0.0

13. Estimated ancillary facilities weighting. Amt approved by Court of Tax Appeals

0÷

$3,838

0.0

14. Estimated Special Education weighting. Amount of Sp. Ed. Funding (f)

4,588,850 ÷

$3,838

1,195.6

15. Estimated Declining Enrollment weighting. Amt apprvd by Court of Tax Appeals

0÷

$3,838

0.0

16. Estimated FHSU Math & Science Academy FTE enrollment

0.0

17. Estimated 2013-2014 operating budget. (Lines 3 through 16)

8,261.0

$3,838

$31,705,718

18. Estimated Cost of Living weighting

$3,838

0.0

(maximum allowed for this district)

(Amt district will use, up to the maximum)

19. Estimated 2013-2014 operating budget. (Include Cost of Living and FHSU)

8,261.0 x

$3,838

$31,705,718

20. Amount to transfer to General Fund (Form 149, Line 3).

21. Total General Fund Budget Authority (Form 150 Line 19 + Line 20)

$31,705,718

Local Option Budget -- See Form 155

22. Estimated 2013-2014 LOB General Fund budget (excludes FHSU weighting & includes higher of 2008-09 Spec Ed or current year Spec Ed)

(Lines 3 through 13 + 15 + 18) = 7065.4 x $4,433 = $31320918 +

4,588,850

(Spec Ed)

$35,909,768

7/30/2013 4:14 PM

Form 150

Page 1

(a) FTE is computed by taking the total clock hours of bilingual students who are enrolled and attending in an

approved bilingual class on 9-20-2013 and dividing by 6 (cannot exceed 6 hours for an individual student). Total

clock hours

315.0 ÷ 6 =

52.5000 (Record on Line 5)

(b) FTE is computed by taking the total clock hours of vocational education students who are enrolled and attending

in an approved vocational class on 9-20-2013 and dividing by 6 (cannot exceed 6 hours for an individual student). Total

clock hours

850.0 ÷ 6 =

141.6667 (Record on Line 6)

(d) In order to access new facilities weighting, a USD must have adopted at least a 25% LOB.

(e) Four year old at risk students are counted as .5 FTE. USD must be approved by the Kansas State Department

of Education.

(f) Comes from form 118 (line 20).

(g) 2012-2013 Non Proficient students (excluding free students).

(NOTE: If September 20 falls on a weekend, the following Monday will be the official count date.)

USD#

261

1. September 20, 2012, FTE and February 20, 2013 FTE enrollment (Excludes 4 yr old at risk students.)

4,996.6

2. September 20, 2013, FTE enrollment (Excludes 4 yr old at risk students.)

5,050.0

3. 3 YR AVG FTE: (

4,886.6

4,996.6

(9/20/2011 FTE)*

(line 1)

5,050.0

)/3=

4,977.7

(line 2)

(goes to line 3)

* Excludes 4 yr old at risk students, but includes 2/20/2012 military students.

4. FTE enrollment for budget purposes (higher of line 1, 2, or 3)(Goes to page 1, line 1 if no military provision; see Table IV.)

5,050.0

TABLE II

Low and High Enrollment Weighting

Enrollment of District

Factor

0 - 99.9

1.014331

100 - 299.9

{[7337 - 9.655 (E - 100)]÷3642.4} -1

300 - 1,621.9

{[5406 - 1.237500 (E - 300)]÷3642.4} -1

1622 and over

0.03504

'E' is 9-20-2013 Adjusted FTE Enrollment (from Page 1, line 3)

EXAMPLE: (FTE of 954.0)

FOR COMPUTED FACTORS

SEE 2013-2014 LOW ENROLLMENT

{[5406 - 1.237500 (954.0 - 300)]÷3642.4}-1

AND HIGH ENROLLMENT FACTOR

{[5406 - 1.237500 (654.0)]÷3642.4}-1

TABLE (PAGES 5 AND 6)

{[5406 - 809.325]÷3642.4}-1

{4597.675÷3642.4} -1

1.261991-1

0.261991

TABLE III

Transportation Weighting

1. Area of district in square miles 9-20-2013.

36.0

2. All public pupils transported or for whom transportation is being made available 9-20-2013

who reside in the district 2.5 miles or more (Estimated)

1,860.0 +

0.0 (Table IV) =

1,860.0

(Line 8)

3. Index of density = Line 2

1,860.0 divided by Line 1

36.0

51.67

4. Using index of density (Line 3), determine transportation weighting factor.

0.1498

5. Estimated weighted FTE for transportation. 9-20-2013 number of resident students over

2.5 miles (line 2)

1,860.0

0.1498 factor (Line 4) (to Line 11, Page 1)

278.6

TABLE I

Declining Enrollment Calculation

7/30/2013 4:14 PM

Form 150

Page 2

USD#

261

House Bill 2059 - Military Provision

1. Estimated Adjusted 9-20-2013 FTE (Table 1, Line 4, Form 150)

5,050.0

2. Estimated 2-20-2014 FTE (excludes 4 yr old at risk students) of new students of military

families, not enrolled on 9-20-2013 (Must be at least 25 FTE or 1% of Line 1. If it doesn't

0.0

meet criteria then calculates zero.)

3. Estimated FTE Enrollment count for 2013-2014 (Line 1 + Line 2) to Line 1, Form 150

5,050.0

Number of students in Line 2 with the following weighting factors:

4. Estimated 2-20-2014 4yr old FTE (add to Line 2, Form 150)

0.0

5. Estimated weighted bilingual education enrollment. 2-20-2014 bilingual FTE (a)

0.0000 x 0.395 =

0.0

(add to Line 5, Form 150)

6. Estimated weighted vocational education enrollment. 2-20-2014 vocational education

FTE (b)

0.0000

0.5 (add to Line 6, Form 150)

0.0

7. Estimated weighted at-risk student enrollment ( c). Number of students eligible that qualify for

free lunches as of 2-20-2014

0 x 0.456 (add to Line 7, Form 150)

0.0

8. Estimated 2-20-2014 FTE of new students of military families, not enrolled on 9-20-2013 transported or for whom

0.0

transportation is being made available 2-20-2014 who reside in the district 2.5 miles or more

(goes to Table III, Line 2, Form 150)

9. Estimated weighted 2-20-2014 FTE for New Facilities (d)

FTE

0.0 x 0.25

0.0

(add to Line 10, Form 150)

(a) FTE is computed by taking the total clock hours of bilingual students who are enrolled and attending in an

approved bilingual class on 2-20-2014 and dividing by 6 (cannot exceed 6 hours for an individual student). Total

clock hours

0.0 ÷ 6 =

0.0000 (Record on Line 5)

(b) FTE is computed by taking the total clock hours of vocational students who are enrolled and attending in an

approved vocational class on 2-20-2014 and dividing by 6 (cannot exceed 6 hours for an individual student). Total

clock hours

0.0 ÷ 6 =

0.0000 (Record on Line 6)

(d) In order to access new facilities weighting, a USD must have adopted at least a 25% LOB.

1. Estimated 9/20/2013 FTE Virtual Enrollment

0.0 X

1.05

0.0

2. Estimated Non-Proficient* Virtual Students (headcount)

0.25

0.0

3. Estimated Virtual Students Taking AP** Courses

1st Semester

.08 =

0.0

2nd Semester

.08 =

0.0

4. Estimated Weighted FTE Virtual Enrollment

0.0

* This provision applies to pupils that would qualify for paid or reduced priced lunches, and did not meet proficient

in Math or Reading State Assessments in the prior year. The virtual school must have a virtual at-risk pupil assistance plan on file with KSDE.

** The Advanced Placement (AP) course is not available in the home district of the virtual pupil. The home

district is either more than 200 square miles or has an enrollment of at least 260 pupils.

"Virtual School" means any school or educational program that: (1) Is offered for credit; (2) uses distance-learning

technologies which predominately use internet-based methods to deliver instruction; (3) involves instruction that

occurs asynchronously with the teacher and pupil in separate locations; (4) requires the pupil to make academic

progress toward the next grade level and matriculation from kindergarten through high school graduation;

(5) requires the pupil to demonstrate competence in subject matter for each class or subject in which the pupil

is enrolled as part of the virtual school; and (6) requires age-appropriate pupils to complete state assessment tests.

TABLE

Virtual Enrollment Weighting (K.S.A. 72-3715, 72-3716)

TABLE IV

7/30/2013 4:14 PM

Form 150

Page 3

USD#

261

1. Calculated free lunch percentage for the current year (goes to page 1, line 8)

(Page 1, Line 7 total students eligible for Free Lunches) / (Page 1, Line 3) = 2500 + 0 / 5125 =

48.80%

48.80%

2. District's calculated free lunch percentage for the prior year (info only)

46.10%

ADDITIONAL DEFINITION FOR SCHOOL FACILITIES (Must use a minimum LOB listed below to qualify for this provision.)

a) School Facilities Definition - School facilities weighting is available for school districts whose adopted local option budget (LOB)

is at least 25% for 2013-14 and have constructed an entirely new facility or an addition to an existing facility.

The determination of weighting will be based upon the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) students that are enrolled and

attending in the new facility September 20 (and February 20 for districts qualifying under K.S.A. 72-6448).

In the case of school districts that have constructed an addition to existing facilities, the number of students that are enrolled

and attending in the new addition will be counted on a full-time equivalent basis (see example 2.) The additional weighting

for this provision of the law is applicable for two years only. For a new facility, the FTE is for the entire building

(see example 1). For additions to an existing facility, the following calculating would be utilized.

Example #1: (For new buildings.)

For a totally new constructed building, the FTE equals the total enrollment FTE for that building.

Headcount

FTE

Kindergarten

38.5

Grade 1

87.0

Grade 2

81.0

Grade 3

75.0

Weighting for example:

281.5 X 0.25 = 70.4 X $3838 = $270195

Example #2: (For new additions)

Total number of students in each new classroom

Number of class periods (divide by)

Full-time equivalent enrollment =

Example:

New classroom A =

105 students for the day

New classroom B =

154 students for the day

New classroom C =

133 students for the day

New classroom D =

121 students for the day

TOTAL =

513

divide by

7 class periods

= 73.3FTE

Weighting for above example: 73.3 X 0.25 = 18.3 X $3838 = $70235

Qualifying for New Facilities Weighting

In order to qualify for new facilities weighting, a district must have adopted at least a 25% local option budget.

High At-Risk Weighting Calculation

TABLE VI

7/30/2013 4:14 PM

Form 150

Page 4